From V28 to V40-Taming SC on the GMAT my way
I must say
I was clueless about grammar when I began. The fact that I thought I was
comfortable with verbal went out of the window after my first attempt on the
GMAT. As a part of the series to help those in the same boat as I was some
months ago, I would like to outline my strategy for acing on the SC part of the
test.
You may ask
why SC is so critical and why I lay a lot of stress on SC. Well, it's not
quite hard to see why. Typically on the GMAT you get almost 16-18 questions on
Sentence Correction. That is almost 42% of your verbal sections consists of SC
questions. The fact that it is quite mathematical, and if mastered well, it
will take less than 40 seconds to solve a fairly difficult question, meaning
more time for the portion of the test you may have trouble with. At least I had
trouble with- I was pathetic on CR when I began. There is also a
hidden benefit of this whole strategy that not many of us don't see
immediately. There will be on an average 3-4 questions that will take more
time, typically in your weakest section- in my case CR. If you can save time
with some extra effort on the section that you have trained yourself to be
strong, you will find that there will be more time for your weakest section.
Let me outline the strategy I
followed that helped me tackle the beast.
(Image source- google images)
1. Manhattan Prep- the best out there
Manhattan SC is perhaps the best book you will ever
read on SC. The first few chapters are foundations. But the last few are
the real gems. Sure, they don't have enough questions to practice but
they make up for that with their free test series that come with their SC book
or for that matter any of their books- real meaty stuff out there. Every
question has a concept, most surely tested on the GMAT or gmatprep. They have
years of experience.
2. E-gmat -
I chose e-gmat because it is the closest
that you will get to the real test. (Obviously my first choice was Manhattan,
but it was too expensive for me) They have so many questions tailored to
the gmatprep that by the end of it you will get used to the most
frequently tested concepts on the GMAT. It almost becomes a second nature.
However, you can't rely on only those concepts if you are aiming really high.
There is more to do. I felt some concepts such as absolute phrases, noun
phrases, substantive clauses needed more attention. So I had to study them
separately. Otherwise, great content. Good enough for a 34-38 range. For
Indians- Highly recommended.
3. Notes from GMAT club-
There are quality notes on the
4. Tests are the real deal
I learnt a lot
from tests. Veritas was a not my greatest ally, though, but there are
still interesting concepts there. Manhattan's test is the best out there,
no doubt in my opinion. The explanations are coherent and top notch. E-gmat had scholaranium - they
grill you with the concepts. Very very good. I wish they were adaptive and
not repetitive at times- its good that you repeat the concepts, but at the same
time it may inflate your scores. (in this context I am reminded
of Illusion of learning- a concept that I learnt during the MOOC
session of Learning How to Learn- from
Barbara Oakhley , and Terrence Sejnowsky, University of California, Irvine
– a very interesting subject on how we should learn)
But the larger
point is what you chose to do after the test. Each question on the test is
there for a reason. They are based on a concept that were either tested on the GMAT prep,
or were there on the actual GMAT, or are very close to concepts
generally tested on the GMAT. One should really make sure that they have
understood the underlying principles. Make short notes if you have to. I had a
pocket diary that I would revisit every alternate day before I slept- as a
rule- Something that Amit Raveendra Sir from Byju's classes asked me to do.
Ultimately, make sure that you gather all the concepts and are drilled before
you take the test.
5. Finally, a philosophy that can really help
Never read from unverified sources.
For example questions posted on gmatclub answered by people who did
not have a proven track record on the website (Sometimes verbal forum
moderators answer them, or prep companies also take their time out to
answer these questions- that can be really helpful). I am not saying that they
are wrong. That was just my way of staying clear from guesses and from the
concepts NOT tested on the real test. The idea is- I don't know the
answer, so whatever they say should be taken as it is. It may suit
the question, if you are lucky, but sometimes it is dangerous to form a
concept using the explanations offered. Sometimes the answers use obscure
concepts that had me at sixes and sevens. More importantly,
it took a lot of time to verify them. After all, the objective is not
to solve the question that sprang up on a random test designed by a
random guy, but the objective is to take away a solid concept that can be
applied to more than one question, and a rule that can be applied on the GMAT.
Interestingly, the best way to understand the concept tested on any quality
test, in my opinion, is to copy paste the entire question on Google and look
for solutions from Manhattan, E-Gmat, Economist or a verbal forum
moderator such as Souvik or bb on gmatclub .
If you stick
to a few sources, your ear will be accustomed to listening to a
similar type of answer, it helps you to relate and remember.